People
Research Groups:
More Info
Latest Research Publications:
No Results
Research Groups:
More Info
Terence van Zyl holds the Nedbank Research and Innovation Chair at the University of Johannesburg where he is a Professor in the Institute for Intelligent Systems. He is an NRF rated scientist who received his PhD and MSc in Computer Science from the University of Johannesburg for his thesis on agent-based complex adaptive systems. He has over 15 years of experience researching and innovating large scale streaming analytics systems for government and industry. He has previously served South Africa as a sub-chair within the committee-on earth observation satellites and as part of the South African delegation to the GEO Ministerial. He has received numerous awards including the Meraka Institute innovation excellence award, Council for Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR) einstein special award and IEEE committee on earth observation medal for meritorious service. His research interests include data-driven science and engineering, prescriptive analytics, machine learning, meta-heuristic optimisation, complex adaptive systems, high-performance computing, and artificial intelligence.
Latest Research Publications:
No Results
Research Groups:
More Info
Ivan José Varzinczak is a professor of computer science at Univ. d'Artois and member of CRIL Lab France. He holds a Ph.D. (2006) in Artificial Intelligence from Université Paul Sabatier, France, an M.Sc. (2002) and a B.Sc. (2000) both in Computer Science from the Federal University of Paraná, Brazil.
Ivan’s main research interest area is logic-based knowledge representation and reasoning in artificial intelligence, with focus on modal and description logics and their applications in non-monotonic reasoning, reasoning about actions and change, and the semantic web.
Ivan’s main research interest area is logic-based knowledge representation and reasoning in artificial intelligence, with focus on modal and description logics and their applications in non-monotonic reasoning, reasoning about actions and change, and the semantic web.
Latest Research Publications:
1.
Casini G, Meyer T, Varzinczak I. Contextual Conditional Reasoning. In: 35th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Online: AAAI Press; 2021.
We extend the expressivity of classical conditional reasoning by introducing context as a new parameter. The enriched
conditional logic generalises the defeasible conditional setting in the style of Kraus, Lehmann, and Magidor, and allows for a refined semantics that is able to distinguish, for example, between expectations and counterfactuals. In this paper we introduce the language for the enriched logic and define an appropriate semantic framework for it. We analyse which properties generally associated with conditional reasoning are still satisfied by the new semantic framework, provide a suitable representation result, and define an entailment relation based on Lehmann and Magidor’s generally-accepted notion of Rational Closure.
@{430,
author = {Giovanni Casini, Tommie Meyer, Ivan Varzinczak},
title = {Contextual Conditional Reasoning},
abstract = {We extend the expressivity of classical conditional reasoning by introducing context as a new parameter. The enriched
conditional logic generalises the defeasible conditional setting in the style of Kraus, Lehmann, and Magidor, and allows for a refined semantics that is able to distinguish, for example, between expectations and counterfactuals. In this paper we introduce the language for the enriched logic and define an appropriate semantic framework for it. We analyse which properties generally associated with conditional reasoning are still satisfied by the new semantic framework, provide a suitable representation result, and define an entailment relation based on Lehmann and Magidor’s generally-accepted notion of Rational Closure.},
year = {2021},
journal = {35th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence},
pages = {6254-6261},
month = {02/02/2021-09/02/2021},
publisher = {AAAI Press},
address = {Online},
}
1.
Britz K, Casini G, Meyer T, Moodley K, Sattler U, Varzinczak I. Principles of KLM-style Defeasible Description Logics. Transactions on Computational Logic. 2020;22 (1). doi:10.1145/3420258.
The past 25 years have seen many attempts to introduce defeasible-reasoning capabilities into a description logic setting. Many, if not most, of these attempts are based on preferential extensions of description logics, with a significant number of these, in turn, following the so-called KLM approach to defeasible reasoning initially advocated for propositional logic by Kraus, Lehmann, and Magidor. Each of these attempts has its own aim of investigating particular constructions and variants of the (KLM-style) preferential approach. Here our aim is to provide a comprehensive study of the formal foundations of preferential defeasible reasoning for description logics in the KLM tradition. We start by investigating a notion of defeasible subsumption in the spirit of defeasible conditionals as studied by Kraus, Lehmann, and Magidor in the propositional case. In particular, we consider a natural and intuitive semantics for defeasible subsumption, and we investigate KLM-style syntactic properties for both preferential and rational subsumption. Our contribution includes two representation results linking our semantic
constructions to the set of preferential and rational properties considered. Besides showing that our semantics is appropriate, these results pave the way for more effective decision procedures for defeasible reasoning in description logics. Indeed, we also analyse the problem of non-monotonic reasoning in description logics at the level of entailment and present an algorithm for the computation of rational closure of a defeasible knowledge base. Importantly, our algorithm relies completely on classical entailment and shows that the computational complexity of reasoning over defeasible knowledge bases is no worse than that of reasoning in the underlying classical DL ALC.
@article{433,
author = {Katarina Britz, Giovanni Casini, Tommie Meyer, Kody Moodley, Uli Sattler, Ivan Varzinczak},
title = {Principles of KLM-style Defeasible Description Logics},
abstract = {The past 25 years have seen many attempts to introduce defeasible-reasoning capabilities into a description logic setting. Many, if not most, of these attempts are based on preferential extensions of description logics, with a significant number of these, in turn, following the so-called KLM approach to defeasible reasoning initially advocated for propositional logic by Kraus, Lehmann, and Magidor. Each of these attempts has its own aim of investigating particular constructions and variants of the (KLM-style) preferential approach. Here our aim is to provide a comprehensive study of the formal foundations of preferential defeasible reasoning for description logics in the KLM tradition. We start by investigating a notion of defeasible subsumption in the spirit of defeasible conditionals as studied by Kraus, Lehmann, and Magidor in the propositional case. In particular, we consider a natural and intuitive semantics for defeasible subsumption, and we investigate KLM-style syntactic properties for both preferential and rational subsumption. Our contribution includes two representation results linking our semantic
constructions to the set of preferential and rational properties considered. Besides showing that our semantics is appropriate, these results pave the way for more effective decision procedures for defeasible reasoning in description logics. Indeed, we also analyse the problem of non-monotonic reasoning in description logics at the level of entailment and present an algorithm for the computation of rational closure of a defeasible knowledge base. Importantly, our algorithm relies completely on classical entailment and shows that the computational complexity of reasoning over defeasible knowledge bases is no worse than that of reasoning in the underlying classical DL ALC.},
year = {2020},
journal = {Transactions on Computational Logic},
volume = {22 (1)},
pages = {1-46},
publisher = {ACM},
url = {https://dl-acm-org.ezproxy.uct.ac.za/doi/abs/10.1145/3420258},
doi = {10.1145/3420258},
}
1.
Casini G, Meyer T, Varzinczak I. Rational Defeasible Belief Change. In: 17th International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR 2020). Virtual: IJCAI; 2020. doi:10.24963/kr.2020/22.
We present a formal framework for modelling belief change within a non-monotonic reasoning system. Belief change and non-monotonic reasoning are two areas that are formally closely related, with recent attention being paid towards the analysis of belief change within a non-monotonic environment. In this paper we consider the classical AGM belief change operators, contraction and revision, applied to a defeasible setting in the style of Kraus, Lehmann, and Magidor. The investigation leads us to the formal characterisation of a number of classes of defeasible belief change operators. For the most interesting classes we need to consider the problem of iterated belief change, generalising the classical work of Darwiche and Pearl in the process. Our work involves belief change operators aimed at ensuring logical consistency, as well as the characterisation of analogous operators aimed at obtaining coherence—an important notion within the field of logic-based ontologies
@{382,
author = {Giovanni Casini, Tommie Meyer, Ivan Varzinczak},
title = {Rational Defeasible Belief Change},
abstract = {We present a formal framework for modelling belief change within a non-monotonic reasoning system. Belief change and non-monotonic reasoning are two areas that are formally closely related, with recent attention being paid towards the analysis of belief change within a non-monotonic environment. In this paper we consider the classical AGM belief change operators, contraction and revision, applied to a defeasible setting in the style of Kraus, Lehmann, and Magidor. The investigation leads us to the formal characterisation of a number of classes of defeasible belief change operators. For the most interesting classes we need to consider the problem of iterated belief change, generalising the classical work of Darwiche and Pearl in the process. Our work involves belief change operators aimed at ensuring logical consistency, as well as the characterisation of analogous operators aimed at obtaining coherence—an important notion within the field of logic-based ontologies},
year = {2020},
journal = {17th International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR 2020)},
pages = {213-222},
month = {12/09/2020},
publisher = {IJCAI},
address = {Virtual},
url = {https://library.confdna.com/kr/2020/},
doi = {10.24963/kr.2020/22},
}
1.
Britz K, Varzinczak I. Preferential tableaux for contextual defeasible ALC. In: 28th International Conference on Automated Reasoning with Analytic Tableaux and Related Methods (TABLEAUX). Springer LNAI no. 11714; 2019. https://www.springer.com/gp/book/9783030290252.
In recent work, we addressed an important limitation in previous ex- tensions of description logics to represent defeasible knowledge, namely the re- striction in the semantics of defeasible concept inclusion to a single preference or- der on objects of the domain. Syntactically, this limitation translates to a context- agnostic notion of defeasible subsumption, which is quite restrictive when it comes to modelling different nuances of defeasibility. Our point of departure in our recent proposal allows for different orderings on the interpretation of roles. This yields a notion of contextual defeasible subsumption, where the context is informed by a role. In the present paper, we extend this work to also provide a proof-theoretic counterpart and associated results. We define a (naïve) tableau- based algorithm for checking preferential consistency of contextual defeasible knowledge bases, a central piece in the definition of other forms of contextual defeasible reasoning over ontologies, notably contextual rational closure.
@{247,
author = {Katarina Britz, Ivan Varzinczak},
title = {Preferential tableaux for contextual defeasible ALC},
abstract = {In recent work, we addressed an important limitation in previous ex- tensions of description logics to represent defeasible knowledge, namely the re- striction in the semantics of defeasible concept inclusion to a single preference or- der on objects of the domain. Syntactically, this limitation translates to a context- agnostic notion of defeasible subsumption, which is quite restrictive when it comes to modelling different nuances of defeasibility. Our point of departure in our recent proposal allows for different orderings on the interpretation of roles. This yields a notion of contextual defeasible subsumption, where the context is informed by a role. In the present paper, we extend this work to also provide a proof-theoretic counterpart and associated results. We define a (naïve) tableau- based algorithm for checking preferential consistency of contextual defeasible knowledge bases, a central piece in the definition of other forms of contextual defeasible reasoning over ontologies, notably contextual rational closure.},
year = {2019},
journal = {28th International Conference on Automated Reasoning with Analytic Tableaux and Related Methods (TABLEAUX)},
pages = {39-57},
month = {03/09-05/09},
publisher = {Springer LNAI no. 11714},
isbn = {ISBN 978-3-030-29026-9},
url = {https://www.springer.com/gp/book/9783030290252},
}
1.
Britz K, Varzinczak I. Contextual rational closure for defeasible ALC. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence. 2019;87(1-2). doi:10.1007/s10472-019-09658-2.
Description logics have been extended in a number of ways to support defeasible reason- ing in the KLM tradition. Such features include preferential or rational defeasible concept inclusion, and defeasible roles in complex concept descriptions. Semantically, defeasible subsumption is obtained by means of a preference order on objects, while defeasible roles are obtained by adding a preference order to role interpretations. In this paper, we address an important limitation in defeasible extensions of description logics, namely the restriction in the semantics of defeasible concept inclusion to a single preference order on objects. We do this by inducing a modular preference order on objects from each modular preference order on roles, and using these to relativise defeasible subsumption. This yields a notion of contextualised rational defeasible subsumption, with contexts described by roles. We also provide a semantic construction for rational closure and a method for its computation, and present a correspondence result between the two.
@article{246,
author = {Katarina Britz, Ivan Varzinczak},
title = {Contextual rational closure for defeasible ALC},
abstract = {Description logics have been extended in a number of ways to support defeasible reason- ing in the KLM tradition. Such features include preferential or rational defeasible concept inclusion, and defeasible roles in complex concept descriptions. Semantically, defeasible subsumption is obtained by means of a preference order on objects, while defeasible roles are obtained by adding a preference order to role interpretations. In this paper, we address an important limitation in defeasible extensions of description logics, namely the restriction in the semantics of defeasible concept inclusion to a single preference order on objects. We do this by inducing a modular preference order on objects from each modular preference order on roles, and using these to relativise defeasible subsumption. This yields a notion of contextualised rational defeasible subsumption, with contexts described by roles. We also provide a semantic construction for rational closure and a method for its computation, and present a correspondence result between the two.},
year = {2019},
journal = {Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence},
volume = {87},
pages = {83-108},
issue = {1-2},
isbn = {ISSN: 1012-2443},
url = {https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10472-019-09658-2},
doi = {10.1007/s10472-019-09658-2},
}
Research Groups:
More Info
Latest Research Publications:
No Results
Research Groups:
More Info
Tezira is Pursuing her PhD in the Adaptive and Cognitive Systems Lab at the University of Cape Town. Her research is on Designing and Evaluating an Agent-based Architecture for Automatic Knowledge Discovery and Evolution. She is also an Assistant Lecturer at Mbarara University of Science and Technology in the Department of Computer Science, Faculty of Computing and Informatics.
Latest Research Publications:
1.
Wanyana T, Nzomo M, Price CS, Moodley D. Combining Machine Learning and Bayesian Networks for ECG Interpretation and Explanation. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies for Ageing Well and e-Health - ICT4AWE. INSTICC: SciTePress; 2022. doi:https://doi.org/10.5220/0011046100003188.
We explore how machine learning (ML) and Bayesian networks (BNs) can be combined in a personal health agent (PHA) for the detection and interpretation of electrocardiogram (ECG) characteristics. We propose a PHA that uses ECG data from wearables to monitor heart activity, and interprets and explains the observed readings. We focus on atrial fibrillation (AF), the commonest type of arrhythmia. The absence of a P-wave in an ECG is the hallmark indication of AF. Four ML models are trained to classify an ECG signal based on the presence or absence of the P-wave: multilayer perceptron (MLP), logistic regression, support vector machine, and random forest. The MLP is the best performing model with an accuracy of 89.61% and an F1 score of 88.68%. A BN representing AF risk factors is developed based on expert knowledge from the literature and evaluated using Pitchforth and Mengersen’s validation framework. The P-wave presence or absence as determined by the ML model is input into the BN. The PHA is evaluated using sample use cases to illustrate how the BN can explain the occurrence of AF using diagnostic reasoning. This gives the most likely AF risk factors for the individual
@inbook{478,
author = {Tezira Wanyana, Mbithe Nzomo, C. Sue Price, Deshen Moodley},
title = {Combining Machine Learning and Bayesian Networks for ECG Interpretation and Explanation},
abstract = {We explore how machine learning (ML) and Bayesian networks (BNs) can be combined in a personal health agent (PHA) for the detection and interpretation of electrocardiogram (ECG) characteristics. We propose a PHA that uses ECG data from wearables to monitor heart activity, and interprets and explains the observed readings. We focus on atrial fibrillation (AF), the commonest type of arrhythmia. The absence of a P-wave in an ECG is the hallmark indication of AF. Four ML models are trained to classify an ECG signal based on the presence or absence of the P-wave: multilayer perceptron (MLP), logistic regression, support vector machine, and random forest. The MLP is the best performing model with an accuracy of 89.61% and an F1 score of 88.68%. A BN representing AF risk factors is developed based on expert knowledge from the literature and evaluated using Pitchforth and Mengersen’s validation framework. The P-wave presence or absence as determined by the ML model is input into the BN. The PHA is evaluated using sample use cases to illustrate how the BN can explain the occurrence of AF using diagnostic reasoning. This gives the most likely AF risk factors for the individual},
year = {2022},
journal = {Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies for Ageing Well and e-Health - ICT4AWE},
pages = {81-92},
publisher = {SciTePress},
address = {INSTICC},
isbn = {978-989-758-566-1},
doi = {https://doi.org/10.5220/0011046100003188},
}
1.
Wanyana T, Moodley D. An Agent Architecture for Knowledge Discovery and Evolution. In: KI 2021: Advances in Artificial Intelligence. volume 12873. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2021. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-87626-5_18.
The abductive theory of method (ATOM) was recently proposed to describe the process that scientists use for knowledge discovery. In this paper we propose an agent architecture for knowledge discovery and evolution (KDE) based on ATOM. The agent incorporates a combination of ontologies, rules and Bayesian networks for representing different aspects of its internal knowledge. The agent uses an external AI service to detect unexpected situations from incoming observations. It then uses rules to analyse the current situation and a Bayesian network for finding plausible explanations for unexpected situations. The architecture is evaluated and analysed on a use case application for monitoring daily household electricity consumption patterns.
@inbook{425,
author = {Tezira Wanyana, Deshen Moodley},
title = {An Agent Architecture for Knowledge Discovery and Evolution},
abstract = {The abductive theory of method (ATOM) was recently proposed to describe the process that scientists use for knowledge discovery. In this paper we propose an agent architecture for knowledge discovery and evolution (KDE) based on ATOM. The agent incorporates a combination of ontologies, rules and Bayesian networks for representing different aspects of its internal knowledge. The agent uses an external AI service to detect unexpected situations from incoming observations. It then uses rules to analyse the current situation and a Bayesian network for finding plausible explanations for unexpected situations. The architecture is evaluated and analysed on a use case application for monitoring daily household electricity consumption patterns.},
year = {2021},
journal = {KI 2021: Advances in Artificial Intelligence},
edition = {volume 12873},
pages = {241-256},
publisher = {Springer International Publishing},
address = {Cham},
isbn = {978-3-030-87626-5},
doi = {https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-87626-5_18},
}
1.
Wanyana T, Moodley D, Meyer T. An Ontology for Supporting Knowledge Discovery and Evolution. In: First Southern African Conference for Artificial Intelligence Research. Virtual: SACAIR2020; 2020. https://2020.sacair.org.za/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/SACAIR_Proceedings-MainBook_Finv4_compressed.pdf?_ga=2.116601743.849395099.1621802506-572599210.1621419278.
Knowledge Discovery and Evolution (KDE) is of interest to a broad array of researchers from both Philosophy of Science (PoS) and Artificial Intelligence (AI), in particular, Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR), Machine Learning and Data Mining (ML-DM) and the Agent Based Systems (ABS) communities. In PoS, Haig recently pro- posed a so-called broad theory of scientific method that uses abduction for generating theories to explain phenomena. He refers to this method of scientific inquiry as the Abductive Theory of Method (ATOM). In this paper, we analyse ATOM, align it with KR and ML-DM perspectives and propose an algorithm and an ontology for supporting agent based knowledge discovery and evolution based on ATOM. We illustrate the use of the algorithm and the ontology on a use case application for electricity consumption behaviour in residential households.
@{405,
author = {Tezira Wanyana, Deshen Moodley, Tommie Meyer},
title = {An Ontology for Supporting Knowledge Discovery and Evolution},
abstract = {Knowledge Discovery and Evolution (KDE) is of interest to a broad array of researchers from both Philosophy of Science (PoS) and Artificial Intelligence (AI), in particular, Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR), Machine Learning and Data Mining (ML-DM) and the Agent Based Systems (ABS) communities. In PoS, Haig recently pro- posed a so-called broad theory of scientific method that uses abduction for generating theories to explain phenomena. He refers to this method of scientific inquiry as the Abductive Theory of Method (ATOM). In this paper, we analyse ATOM, align it with KR and ML-DM perspectives and propose an algorithm and an ontology for supporting agent based knowledge discovery and evolution based on ATOM. We illustrate the use of the algorithm and the ontology on a use case application for electricity consumption behaviour in residential households.},
year = {2020},
journal = {First Southern African Conference for Artificial Intelligence Research},
pages = {206-221},
month = {22/02/2021},
publisher = {SACAIR2020},
address = {Virtual},
isbn = {978-0-620-89373-2},
url = {https://2020.sacair.org.za/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/SACAIR_Proceedings-MainBook_Finv4_compressed.pdf?_ga=2.116601743.849395099.1621802506-572599210.1621419278},
}
More Info
DEGREES LINKED TO THIS GROUP:
2019-Current PhD (Humanities): 'A Critical Inquiry into the Metaphysics for Mind Uploading'.
2019-Current PhD (Humanities): 'A Critical Inquiry into the Metaphysics for Mind Uploading'.
Latest Research Publications:
No Results
Research Groups:
More Info
Latest Research Publications:
No Results
Research Groups:
More Info
Latest Research Publications:
No Results
